Guides
The Digital Product Passport
Challenges, Risks, and Opportunities for Businesses: A Translation Perspective
With the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, known as the ESPR (Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation), the European Union has introduced a tool set to fundamentally reshape the fashion and textile industry: the Digital Product Passport (DPP). In practical terms, this is a digital record associated with each product, accessible via QR code, NFC, or RFID, which collects and makes available verified information on material composition, supply chain origin, environmental impact, repair instructions, and end-of-life disposal recommendations. It is a binding regulatory requirement for any business wanting to sell products on the EU market, regardless of where the producing company is based. The objective is to make environmental and social traceability mandatory for every product entering the EU market. For the entire fashion sector, this means rethinking the way products are designed, manufactured, and communicated.
Translation Challenges
Technical and supply chain terminology
A data structure, not just linear text
Dynamic data and continuous updates
Linguistic accessibility: a regulatory requirement
Advantages for Businesses That Invest in Professional Translation
Legal compliance
Consumer trust
Competitive advantage for early movers
The specific rules for the textile sector are expected by 2027–2028, but businesses that begin building glossaries, processes, and terminological resources today will find themselves at a considerable advantage over those who wait for the rules to take effect. In a market where transparency is becoming a condition of entry, those who arrive with an already-translated DPP are positioned as reliable partners in the eyes of European buyers, distributors, and consumers.
The Risks of Poor Translation
Unofficial terminology: leather and vegan leather
As a result, terms such as pelle sintetica (synthetic leather), ecopelle (vegan leather), or similpelle (faux leather) can no longer legally be used for materials that are not of animal origin. This also includes polyurethane, which does not satisfy any part of this definition. Therefore, describing a synthetic fabric used to make an accessory as ecopelle is a sanctionable breach of the law.
For further information, I recommend consulting the pages of the Italian Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy and the full text of the Legislative Decree. [last accessed: 10/04/2026]
In the context of DPP translation, this distinction is fundamental. Anyone who uses or translates the name of a synthetic material using an equivalent containing the word leather risks producing a document that is non-compliant with the regulation, turning what appears to be a minor terminological error into a concrete legal issue.
Classifications that are not valid in the destination country
The risk is increased when the product is made from exotic skins such as crocodile, alligator, or caiman: three species that are often conflated in commercial usage, but differ in value, characteristics, and regulatory status. Every product made from genuine alligator or crocodile skin sold across borders must be accompanied by a Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) authorisation of Wild Fauna and Flora, transposed into EU law by Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97. The certificate specifies the scientific name of the species, the country of origin, the quantity, and the licence number.
In the DPP of a product made from exotic leather, the material designation must be consistent with that shown in the accompanying CITES certificate. Generically stating “crocodile leather” when the species is caiman (Caiman crocodilus) or using a common name instead of the scientific designation creates an inconsistency between the digital passport and the customs documentation, with consequences for regulatory non-compliance. For anyone translating a DPP, it is essential to ensure that the terminology corresponds exactly with what appears in the official supply chain documentation.
For further information on Italian legislation, see the page of the Italian Ministry of the Environment. To verify the regulatory status of a species and the correct scientific designation before completing the DPP, the official Species+ database is available at https://www.speciesplus.net, managed by the CITES Secretariat.
Penalties, greenwashing, and reputational damage
On the greenwashing front, a vaguely translated environmental term can turn a neutral statement into an unsupported claim with increasingly severe repercussions in the context of the European Green Claims Regulation.
On the reputational front, the DPP is a transparency tool designed to strengthen consumer trust: an inaccurate or misleading digital passport produces precisely the opposite effect, undermining brand credibility at the very moment when transparency has become a market value in its own right.
The Digital Product Passport arrives at a time when the textile sector is being called upon to guarantee transparency. For Made in Italy companies, which have always been valued for their material quality, supply chain control, and artisanal mastery, this regulatory shift represents a tangible opportunity for valorisation. The values that, until now, have simply been entrusted to brand reputation or the label on a tag, are now visible and verifiable. Manufacturing in Italy, the choice of raw materials, the traceability of the production process, and other unique characteristics can finally be communicated in a structured way, in every language, to every European consumer who scans a QR code.